写作 今年2月6日.教育部对“高中是否应该取消文理分科 征求民意.调查结果如图表所示. 请结合题示.用英语写一篇题为“Should Science and Ar

写作

今年2月6日，教育部对“高中是否应该取消文理分科”征求民意，调查结果如图表所示。

请结合题示，用英语写一篇题为“Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?”的短文，谈一下你的看法，以便刊登在某一英文报刊上。

要求：

1．观点明确，理由充分。

2．不要逐句翻译。

3．字数：120－150，开头已经给出，不计人总词数。

Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?

The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads throughout the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes．________

试题答案

答案：

One possible version：

The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads throughout the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes．About 50％ of the people interviewed think it unwise to get arts and science separated in high school．In their opinion,a real expert needs a wide range of knowledge, With the development of modern society, multi-skilled people are in great demand, However, over 40％ of them insist that they should be separated so that students can concentrate on some subjects and become experts, Besides, they will not be overburdened as before．

As far as I'm concerned, a comprehensive education si better than a separated one, A strong ability in both science and arts is helpful for the long-term development of individuals and the society as a whole, Worldwide, only in China science and arts are separated, which has had a bad effect on students' sound development．It's high time we changed this model, I don't think comprehensivce education will put a heavy burden on the students,

写作评分细则

极优(30分)

上档(18－29分)

优秀(26－29分)：要点全面，紧扣主题，观点表达充分；能有效地使用成分，具备较强的书面表达能力，语言小错不超过4个。

良好(22－25分)：要点全面，紧扣主题，观点表达紧扣主题，语言有少量错误但基本不影响意思的表达。

一般(18－21分)：要点全面，紧扣主题，观点表达基本正确，语言错误已影响了意思的表达，但多数句子基本正确。

下档(0－17分)

较差(13－17分)：能够写出基本要点，行文基本连贯，语言错误较多，但句子基本正确。

差(6－12分)：写出部分重点，能够写出少数与内容有关的短句。

很差(0－5分)：只写出与内容有关的词语；抄写阅读中与写作无关的内容。

注意事项：

1．评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其为上档、下档。

2．词汇少于120者，从应得的分中扣2分。

3．书写太差，以致影响阅读，从应得的分中扣2分。

关于大错和小错：

1．小错：拼写、冠词、大小写和标点符号等。

2．大错：搭配错误，词语使用错误(介词、动词、形容词、副词)，时态，语态，主谓一致，非谓语动词，句式等错误。